New Articles July 5, 2007:
Report #1: 
EAT TO LIVE: NEW FEARS OVER ASPARTAME
Report #2:  MSG And Aspartame


Introduction

Since the release of the 2005 Ramazzini 3-year Study on 1,800 rats, which supports the conclusion that aspartame is linked to brain tumors in rats, there has been much public outcry as to the safety of aspartame in humans.  I'm not qualified to answer that question, but our Ministry of Health officials in Canada should be.

Toward that end, I have been collecting information as it has been reported over the internet and in newspapers, which tend to indicate that the original studies should be reviewed in light of the more extensive recent study.  I have also initiated contact with the Minister and his officials, which has not yet been very productive.

My efforts to date are indicated below.

If you have other news items, or anecdotal information, please contact me at: multieagle@yahoo.com with details.

Thank you.

THE QUESTION OF ASPARTAME

Dear Rt. Hon. Minister of Health,
 
I have written several times and have not yet received a satisfactory answer to my questions.
 
1.  The link provided to information upon which the Government agency apparently base their conclusions as to the safety of aspartame does not work.  http://www.hc-sc.gc.c/fn-an/securit/facts-faits/aspartame/aspartame01_e.html    I requested a proper link to the information and no one has replied.  Please provide the proper link.
 
2.a  What is the Ministry of Health's official reaction to the 2005 3-year Ramazzini Study on 1,880 rats which supports the conclusion that aspartame is a causual link in the development of brain tumors.
2.b  Since the introduction of aspartame into processed food and soft drinks has there been a rise in the occurance of brain tumors in Canadian population.  And if so, what the yearly incidence of brain tumors?
2.c  As a subsidiary question to the above.  Although a more recent wide-scale preservative technique, a) what has been the increase in brain tumors since the introduction of irradiated fresh foods since its introduction, and b) has there been an increase during this period in the level of irradiation permissible in fresh foods?  Please outline the yearly brain tumor figures by year since the introduction of asparatme.
 
3.  The Canadian Health Ministry's response to me was identical to the US FDA:  FDA's Consumer Online Magazine, February 2006 assures us: "[Aspartame] has come under fire in recent years from individuals who have used the Internet in an attempt to link the sweetener to brain tumors and other serious disorders. But FDA stands behind its original approval of aspartame, and subsequent evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A tiny segment of the population is sensitive to one of the sweetener's byproducts and should restrict intake. However, the agency continually monitors safety information on food ingredients such as aspartame and may take action to protect public health if it receives credible scientific evidence indicating a safety problem"
 
Follows is a quote from Dr. Betty Martini:  "In 1995 FDA listed 92 symptoms from 10,000 volunteered consumer complaints including 4 types of seizures, sexual dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems, comas and death. So you stopped publishing the list and now deny it existed. I've sent another 10,000. Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of case histories has swept over you from afflicted victims and survivors nationwide. I have copies of them. You want credible scientific evidence? Consider this: 
  For 16 years FDA rejected aspartame because of brain tumors. Then Don Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle Co, went to Washington with Reagan and the next day his buddy Arthur Hayes was appointed FDA Commissioner. To avoid any action against aspartame by the outgoing Commissioner an executive freeze order was ordered by Ronald Reagan treacherously making him powerless till Hayes got to town. Reagan was a tragic Alzheimer's victim, a dread affliction aspartame invokes. It is rumored he was addicted to Equal, this brain eradicating neurotoxin, and memory loss is number 9 on your list of 92 symptoms, right under seizures, number 8. 
  Now Hayes approved aspartame over the objections of his own scientific Board of Inquiry. Searle was in money trouble until Hayes, Rumsfeld's stooge, opened the golden door. Hayes soon was under investigation for conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year consulting contract from Searle's PR firm for a reported $1,000/day. Consultants don't need to show up for work; just answer questions on the phone, you know: How's the fishing, Artie?"
 
In light of the dubious way in which aspartame was introduced into the USA, a) was there any additional testing done by the Canadian Government?  and b) What is your Ministry's stance as to the 2004 3-year Italian study which indicates a co-relation between aspartame and brain tumors?
 
Please reply via regular mail to:
 
Gordon Tibbles
 
Thank you.
 
Yours truly,
 
Gordon Tibbles
 
New Material in reference to above:
 
OPEN LETTER TO FDA - VIA CERTIFIED MAIL

DELANEY AMENDMENT: If a product causes cancer in animals it cannot be put in food!

The late FDA Toxicologist, Dr. Adrian Gross, testified to the Senate: "In view of all these indications that the cancer-causing potential of aspartame is a matter that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask: What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act? Is it not clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that aspartame has caused brain tumors or brain cancer in animals?

"Given that this is so (and I cannot see any kind of tenable argument opposing the view that aspartame causes cancer) how would the FDA justify its position that it views a certain amount of aspartame (50mgm/kgm body weight) as constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily Intake) or "safe" level of it? Is that position not equivalent to setting a "tolerance" for this food additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA itself elects to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public?"

Your toxicologist admitted you broke the law by approving aspartame. He also said the significance of the studies is much greater if one considers that brain tumors in rats is very rare: "the historical control rate for such tumors amongst large populations of rats indicates that no more than 49 animals afflicted with them have been found amongst nearly 60,000 rats, an incidence rate of less than 1/10th of 1% FDA never fails to consider this aspect of the "historical control" incidence. ... One cannot help wondering just why they failed to consider this particular aspect in reference to the cancer-induction of aspartame. Had they addressed the historical incidence of brain tumors amongst rats as presented by Dr. Olney, they could not have failed to conclude what I have concluded: - tumors amongst the rats exposed to aspartame increases many-fold " 8/1/85 Senate, S 10839 - 10840

FDA broke other laws, as shown in the National Soft Drink Association's long protest against approval, found in the Senate Congressional Record of 5/7/85 Pages S5507-9: "Section 402 of the FDC Act 21 provides a food is adulterated if it contains, in whole or in part 'a decomposed substance or if it is otherwise unfit for food'. Searle has not demonstrated to a reasonable certainty that aspartame and its degradation products are safe for use in soft drinks. ... Aspartame is inherently markedly and uniquely unstable in aqueous media. In a liquid such as a soft drink aspartame will degrade as a function of temperature and pH."

The hotter it gets the quicker aspartame decomposes. NSDA next reveals Searle deliberately used the wrong test: "High pressure liquid chromatography is a far superior analytical method relative to thin layer chromatography and numerous HPLC methods exist for the detection and quantification of amino acids. Searle's choice of TLC over HPLC adversely affected the quality and type of analytical data generated on aspartame and its decomposition products in soft drinks.. .. an important decomposition product of aspartame, aspartic acid cannot be detected at all using TLC. The inability to account for as much as 39% of aspartame's decomposition products is significant. The marked and rapid decomposition of aspartame in soft drinks under temperatures known to prevail is apparent from data in the present record and discussed above in these objections."

When responsible scientists, physicians and legislators try to protect us from these criminals the industry with bottomless checkbooks annihilate our rights and welfare. Arizona DHS studies showed aspartame in beverages breaks down into free methanol, wood alcohol, formaldehyde, diketopiperazine, formic acid (among other toxins), and a ban of aspartame was being considered. In 1985 Dr. Woodrow Monte, Director of Food Science and Nutrition Lab, Arizona State University, petitioned for a hearing to ban aspartame, because high temperatures in that state accelerate methanol and formaldehyde formation. By an unusual maneuver the legislature altered the text in a Toxic Waste Bill so to ban regulation of FDA-approved food additives. This scuttled the hearing Dr. Monte had been promised.

How are these abominations maneuvered? G. D. Searle lobbyists were Andrew Herwitz, Governor Babbitt's former Chief of Staff, and other powerful hacks. Then Searle officials contributed to the campaign of Arizona House Majority Leader Burton Barr. The Committee to Reelect Barr gave campaign contributions to state representatives Don Aldridge, Karen Mills, & Jan Breuer. They all voted on the side of G. D. Searle. The legislators were bought and paid for, and cared not for Arizona citizens. (Gordon 1987)

Another trampled law: Interstate Commerce regulations prohibit shipping adulterated products, including drugs, across state lines. All aspartame products are adulterated!

By law an additive must be inert. It's illegal to sell a drug as an additive. In original studies aspartame triggered brain, mammary, uterine, ovarian, testicular, thyroid and pancreatic tumors and is an excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic drug. The 2005 3-year Ramazzini Study on 1,800 rats confirmed what FDA knew from the beginning: aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen that caused leukemia, cancer of the kidneys, lymphoma and cancer of the cranial peripheral nerves. Only the rats fed aspartame developed malignant brain tumors. Producers complain researchers let test animals finish their lives rather than killing them at 24 months before most cancers develop. Standard practice is to kill the animals before they get sick. The Ramazzini study was peer reviewed by 7 world experts.

So FDA's Consumer Online Magazine, February 2006 assures us: "[Aspartame] has come under fire in recent years from individuals who have used the Internet in an attempt to link the sweetener to brain tumors and other serious disorders. But FDA stands behind its original approval of aspartame, and subsequent evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A tiny segment of the population is sensitive to one of the sweetener's byproducts and should restrict intake. However, the agency continually monitors safety information on food ingredients such as aspartame and may take action to protect public health if it receives credible scientific evidence indicating a safety problem"

"A tiny segment?" How about everyone who uses it? In 1995 FDA listed 92 symptoms from 10,000 volunteered consumer complaints including 4 types of seizures, sexual dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems, comas and death. So you stopped publishing the list and now deny it existed. I've sent another 10,000. Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of case histories has swept over you from afflicted victims and survivors nationwide. I have copies of them. You want credible scientific evidence? Consider this:

For 16 years FDA rejected aspartame because of brain tumors. Then Don Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle Co, went to Washington with Reagan and the next day his buddy Arthur Hayes was appointed FDA Commissioner. To avoid any action against aspartame by the outgoing Commissioner an executive freeze order was ordered by Ronald Reagan treacherously making him powerless till Hayes got to town. Reagan was a tragic Alzheimer's victim, a dread affliction aspartame invokes. It is rumored he was addicted to Equal, this brain eradicating neurotoxin, and memory loss is number 9 on your list of 92 symptoms, right under seizures, number 8.

Now Hayes approved aspartame over the objections of his own scientific Board of Inquiry. Searle was in money trouble until Hayes, Rumsfeld's stooge, opened the golden door. Hayes soon was under investigation for conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year consulting contract from Searle's PR firm for a reported $1,000/day. Consultants don't need to show up for work; just answer questions on the phone, you know: How's the fishing, Artie?"

Aspartame interacts with all drugs and vaccines:
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm
Aspartame-using athletes can drop dead:
http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_msg_scd.htm
Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, 1,038 page medical text
http://www.sunsentpress.com
Excitotoxins, The Taste that Kills http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
Greek studies on aspartame, Jan, 2006
http://www.wnho.net/newgreekaspartame studies.html
Aspartame makers also manufacture deceit http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
http://www.wnho.net/recipefordeath.htm



Doctor Ralph Walton's investigation of funding & study-results revealed 92% of independent studies show aspartame is a toxin. To show aspartame is safe the producers have to buy & control the study, as they did the Arizona legislature.
http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html

Roger Williams, Member of Parliament, has called for a British ban. England wouldn't have approved aspartame had FDA's intended indictment been known. Searle sneaked it thru by dealing with Paul Turner of Food Standards, who approved it without publicity. A Guardian article detailed the collusion.

FDA asked the Justice Department to prosecute G. D. Searle Co. for fraud, but the producers hired the prosecutors and the case expired with the statute of limitations. Neat trick! As an encore a parade of FDA officials including 3 Commissioners have been welcomed into the aspartame business. Telling FDA of aspartame toxicity is complaining to the Mafia about murder.

In the CDC documentary: SWEET MISERY: A POISONED WORLD [amazon.com & Barnes & Noble] see Atty. James Turner, former Nader Raider, explain how Don Rumsfeld called in his markers to get it approved. FDA had revoked approval because of the brain tumor issue, and because it was not proven safe, leaving this question: For 16 years until Hayes overruled your Board of Inquiry the FDA denied approval and tried to indict Searle for fraud: So why lie about it now? Is there another answer than political corruption? Meanwhile you attempt a rule change to prevent states from writing food safety laws. Do you intend to now go against the Bill of Rights, 9 and 10th amendment which forbids removing the rights of the people and the states?

In the Falklands Robin Goodwin has called for a ban. In New Mexico Stephen Fox has petitioned the Environmental Improvement Board and the Board of Pharmacy to ban aspartame in New Mexico based on the fact that aspartame is adulterated and against the law. Governor Bill Richardson III has been asked by 10 New Mexico State Senators to declare a state of public health emergency, in accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5. The emergency derives from consumers in New Mexico consuming methanol and formaldehyde, derivative aspartame metabolites.

You say you "may" take action to protect public health if you receive credible scientific evidence indicating a safety problem? A mountain of absolute evidence is in your possession! The impeccable Italian study proves aspartame is "a multipotential carcinogen". The bottom line of the new Greek study is Alzheimers. The world's population are guinea pigs, daily proving aspartame destroys the brain, central nervous system, immune system and retina, causes cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, precipitates diabetes, interacts with all drugs and vaccines, triggers obesity and is an endocrine disrupting drug, an abortifacient, adjuvant and teratogen that brings birth defects and retardation. University of Texas epidemiological study on 8 years data linked diet drinks with obesity just a few months ago.

Obviously your allegiance is to Big Pharma & their lobbyists, who are the Washington infestation destroying America with chemical weapons of mass destruction, while you pretend to be saviors and seek to outlaw vitamins and herbs.
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/060207

You once attempted to indict G. D. Searle at a time when you had some conscience under Title 18, Section 1001.

This US Criminal Code declares: "Whoever, in an matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative or judicial matter branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully
* (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
* (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation;
* (3) or make or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false,
fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined under the title or imprisoned.

Today FDA, you are now guilty of the same crime as you deceive the public by telling them aspartame is safe when you have full knowledge it is not only not safe, but that you wanted the manufacturer indicted for fraud. Your own toxicologists, Dr. Adrian Gross and Dr. Jacqueline Verrett observed Searle researchers' manipulation attempting to make a poison show safety. They just couldn't do it as Jerome Bressler explained in the FDA audit. They were caught.

Four years ago I filed a Citizens Petition for ban:
http://www.wnho.net/citizens_aspartame_petition.htm The law requires an answer in 180 days, which law you broke, and brazenly wrote me that you have matters of higher priority. Saving consumer lives is low priority? Or was it impossible to answer my petition that proved from government records that you lie to America?

James Bowen, M.D. with Lou Gehrigs disease from aspartame, wrote FDA: "The only responsible action would be to immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose its toxicities, offer full compensation to the injured, public and criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the fraudulent placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those who work so diligently to keep it on the market as well."

In secret trade information Searle said: "With the spoon-for-spoon, we have no way of estimating maximum likely abuse and hence need to utilize data based on almost complete conversion to DKP. If we include this use in the original FAP, we stand a good chance of ending up with nothing in the short run and nothing in the long run where as the other approach would give us something in the short run and, quite likely as much as we would ever get in the long run." DKP is the brain tumor agent. They knew aspartame would cause these tumors worldwide. Premeditated mass murder!
www.dorway.com

Heroic New Mexico Senator Gerald Ortiz y Pino who just sponsored the bill to ban aspartame said
"Nothing surprises me anymore when it comes to the corrosive influence of money on our public policy... the final reckoning can only be postponed, not avoided"
http://www.rense.com/general69/nmm2.htm

I demand that you invoke the Delaney Amendment! James Turner, who with Dr. John Olney worked to prevent aspartame approval, declares the Delaney Amendment remains as written, although many have attempted to try and repeal it and Michael Taylor wrote a clause attempting to minimize it. Yet they did not succeed he says and it is as valid today as the day it became the law. The Ramazzini study confirms aspartame is a virulent carcinogen. This requires FDA to invoke the Delaney Amendment which is emphatic ­ if a product causes cancer in animals it CANNOT BE PUT IN FOOD.

This should have been done a quarter of a century ago as your scientists advocated. Refusal will confirm once more that FDA is run by political lapdogs dedicated to their personal aggrandizement, treacherously condemning multitudes to disability and death. Mission Possible is a global volunteer force warning consumers about aspartame because FDA refuses to fulfill its commission to enforce laws that protect us.

We're taking aspartame brain tumor cases in NY and NJ for litigation, and this is just the beginning. This is written as an open letter so all reading it will send it to their congressman, explaining how FDA has sanctioned mass poisoning by bureaucratic fiat.

Be warned: A higher judge untouched by bribes has pronounced the inevitable consequence of such duplicity: "Woe to you who are despoiling and who are dealing treacherously As soon as you have finished as a despoiler, you will be despoiled. As soon as you have done with dealing treacherously, they will deal treacherously with you." Isaiah 33:1 NWT

Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder
Mission Possible International
9270 River Club Parkway
Duluth, Georgia 30097
770 242-2599
http://www.wnho.net/
http://www.dorway.com/
www.holisticmed.com/aspartame -
Aspartame Toxicity Center

Dear Sir/Madam, the question of safety appears to rest on evidence originally conducted by testing agencies on behalf of the aspartame industry.  That testing has come under serious scrutiny in the USA and other countries.  It would appear that some tests were "fudged" to put it mildly, and that the original author of one test that weighed heavily in the US FDA approval process will not give interviews, and in fact, cannot be currently located.
 
The New Mexico action preceded the new  seven (7) year round of testing conducted in Italy, the most comprehensive to date, which demonstrates definite carcinogenic actions.
 
I request again, reference to specific tests undertaken by Health Canada, or failing such tests on the part of Canada, a list of the research test, giving the author's credentials and who funded the tests.
 
Looking forward to your response, I remain
 
Yours truly,
 
Gordon Tibbles


BACKGROUND TO THE ABOVE
----- Original Message -----
From: ECD-DCHG2
To: 
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject: In response to your correspondence of February 13 and 14, 2006, addressed to the Minister of Health


Dear Mr. Tibbles:

                Thank you for your correspondence of February 13, and February 14, 2006, addressed to the Honourable Tony Clement, Minister of Health, concerning the safety of aspartame.

                Before permitting the use of aspartame in foods in Canada, Health Canada officials evaluated an extensive array of toxicological tests.  Since its approval, a number of clinical studies have been conducted on aspartame.  To date, there is no evidence to suggest that the consumption of foods containing aspartame, according to the provisions of the Food and Drug Regulations, and as part of a well-balanced diet, poses a health hazard to consumers.  In addition, international organizations, such as the Scientific Committee for Food of the European Community, and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, have reached similar conclusions.

                Nevertheless, some individuals may exhibit an allergic-type reaction or hypersensitivity when exposed to aspartame.  For those who suffer from this sensitivity, avoiding this substance is recommended.  Therefore, in accordance with the Food and Drug Regulations, its presence must be declared on food labels.

                Departmental officials are aware of claims made against aspartame, and continue to monitor and evaluate new research and, as yet, have not found clinical studies that associate its use with the onset of diseases or adverse effects.  Should studies raise concerns about the use of aspartame, Health Canada would take appropriate measures to protect the health of Canadians.

                Further information relating to the safety of aspartame can be found on Health Canada's Web site at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.c/fn-an/securit/facts-faits/aspartame/aspartame01_e.html.

                Again, thank you for writing.

                                                        Yours sincerely,

                                                        Executive Correspondence Division

Dear Rt. Hon. Clement,
 
I have previously been in contact with the Ministry regarding the use of aspartame in food.  I did not receive a reply to my querry, other than that the memo would be sent to the appropriate department.
 
There is an increasing conern that aspartame contributes to serious health issues.  The following article in reference to the United States, New Mexico government actions to have aspartame banned as a food additive.
 
Can you assure the Canadian citizens that this drug is entirely safe to ingest?  If so, would you please have your staff forward appropriate references to tests which prove that no health issues exist?
 
If necessary, I will follow this email querry with a regular mail.
 
Please advise.
 
Thank you,
 
Gordon Tibbles

 
New Mexico Governor William Blaine Richardson III has been requested by 10 New Mexico State Senators in a letter to declare a state of public health emergency, in accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5.

To wit:

"The nature of the emergency derives from 70% of the adults and 40% of the children in New Mexico having consumed methanol and formaldehyde, the resultant metabolites from their ingestion of aspartame. The conditions that cause the emergency are the fact that the G.D. Searle Corporation ramrodded the approval of this illegal drug through the United States Food and Drug Administration in 1981 asa 'food additive.' It is now found in over 6,000 food products and over 600 children's medications,vitamins, and aspirin."

"The expected duration of the emergency is more than thirty days necessary to prevent further instances of methanol/formaldehyde poisoning, and will end when all products containing aspartame, a poisonous and deleterious food additive are removed from sale in New Mexico in accordance with statutes in the New Mexico Food act."

Richardson has been requested by the 10 Senators to recognize aspartame disease as a public health emergency on February 13, 2006.

The Senators include Judiciary Chairman, Cisco Mc Sorley; Indian Affairs Chairman, John Pinto, Navajo; Rules Chair, Linda Lopez; Conservation Chairman, Carlos Cisneros, Finance Committee Vice Chair, John Arthur Smith; Corporations Committee, Bernadette Sanchez; Indian Affairs Vice Chairman, Lidio Rainaldi; Rules Vice Chair, John Grubesic; Gerald Ortiz y Pino,and Leonard Tsosie, Navajo.

Most of the New Mexico Legislators have been given copies of Cori Brackett's DVD, Sweet Misery, to educate them during the Interim before next Session for the New Mexico Legislature.

_____

To be apprised of Governor Richardson's response, call Deputy Secretary of Communications Phal Shipley (505)827-3000.

Also see the New York Times Aspartame/Methanol/Formaldehyde in 6000 manufactured food products: article Feb.12,2006 by Melanie Warner.

For more information on the neurodegenerative effects of Aspartame from Neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, contact him in Ridgeland, Mississippi, through Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum. (770) 242-2599.

For medical effects, particularly the effects of aspartame/methanol/formaldehyde on diabetics, please contact Internist H.J. Roberts, author of Aspartame Disease: An FDA Approved Epidemic, through Dr. Martini (770) 242-2599 hjrobertsmd@aol.com

For information on discussions between state's Attorneys General regarding Aspartame suits similar to the Tobacco Suits of the 1990's, please contact Eliot Spitzer of New York; Mike Hatch of Minnesota; former Attorney General of Mississippi, Mike Moore; former Attorney General of Washington, now Governor Christine O. Gregoire; Attorney General Drew Edmondson of Oklahoma; Attorney General of California, William Lockyer; Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan; Deputy Attorney General of California, Ed Weil; Deputy Attorney General of New Mexico, Stuart Bluestone, and the next Attorney General of New Mexico, Dr. Gary King, Ph.D. Chemistry.

New Mexico Secretary of Health is Michelle Lujan Grisham and Secretary of Public Safety is John Denko.

For more articles on Aspartame, please see website for World Natural Health Organization: www.wnho.net

Stephen Fox, Founder, New Mexico Nutrition Council International Board of Honorary Advisors of World Natural Health Organization stephen@santafefineart.com (505) 983-2002


EAT TO LIVE: NEW FEARS OVER ASPARTAME
By JULIA WATSON
UPI Food Writer
LE BUGUE, France, July 2 (UPI) -- Two years ago, Italian researchers at the prestigious Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences published a study that showed feeding rats aspartame at levels per body weight close to those of humans led to an increase in brain tumors, lymphomas and leukemia in the females.

Aspartame, familiar to consumers as brand names NutraSweet and Equal, is an artificial sweetener found globally in approximately 6,000 products.

It's contained in candy, desserts and yogurts. It's in diet sodas and hot chocolate and those sugar-free packets for coffee and tea in restaurants. It's also in some pharmaceutical products, like cough lozenges and vitamins. Some chewing gum is aspartame-sweetened.

At this level of saturation, it represents 62 percent of the artificial sweetener market.

As reported by Eat To Live last May, the FDA rejected the foundation's conclusions, saying they weren't consistent with other studies that the FDA had evaluated that confirmed aspartame was safe as a sweet alternative to sugar.

So the Ramazzini Foundation went back to the drawing board.

This time, it put 4,000 rats on doses of aspartame equivalent in respective body weight to the amount consumed by some people.

With this second investigation, they also began exposing rats to aspartame before they were born. And they allowed them to live until they died a natural death, instead of killing them at two years as in other studies elsewhere.

Their conclusions have just been published in Environmental Health Perspectives, the journal of the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Parents should take particular note.

Again, they found significant increases in lymphomas and leukemia. When fetuses were exposed to the sweetener, the potential carcinogenic effects increased.

A study last year from the National Cancer Institute involving 340,045 men and 226,945 women found no significant link between aspartame and cancer.

But the men and women studied were all between the ages of 50 and 69 and had only begun consuming the sweetener in adulthood.

Children are considerable consumers of aspartame through Diet Coke, Diet Pepsi, Kool-Aid, Jell-O gelatin dessert and pudding mixes and certain Popsicles.

According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the acceptable daily intake of aspartame is equivalent to a child weighing 50 pounds drinking two cans of diet soda daily, or a 150 pound adult drinking just over seven.

It encourages people not to panic. Just to stop buying products containing aspartame.

However, the Ramazzini Foundation researchers write in their study: "On the basis of the present findings, we believe that a review of the current regulations governing the use of aspartame cannot be delayed.

"This review is particularly urgent with regard to aspartame-containing beverages, heavily consumed by children."

The FDA says it has not yet reviewed the report. But it appears it still finds no reason to revise its opinion or advice to consumers.

Since the study's publication, the Center for Science in the Public Interest, on its Web site Chemical Cuisine directory, has now demoted aspartame from the "use caution" category to "everyone should avoid". It also gives thumbs down to acesulfame.

If you want a sweet alternative to sugar, it recommends sucralose, commonly known by the brand name Splenda.

To satisfy a sweet tooth craving, try chewing on dried apricots or a handful of dried prunes or raisins. Stewing then pureeing dried apricots provides a very sweet sauce to pour round or over ice cream or slices of cake that already contain enough of the sugar you crave that you don't need to increase the amount with a butterscotch or chocolate sauce.



MSG And Aspartame
By Dr. Russell Blaylock
A Five Part Audio Series
http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
7-4-7
Dr. Rusell Blayloack, M.D.
 
Did you know that MSG, and Aspartame are heavily linked to increased cancer rates as shown in a twice-repeated lifetime study of animals by Italian Scientists? 
 
Did you know that once cancer is established in the body MSG and Aspartame will help it spread quickly throughout?
 
Did you know that MSG is injected into rats because they are not naturally obese? When injected with MSG their bodies are triggered to store fat cells.
 
Did you know that FDA refuses to look at this evidence when they are required by law to do so?
 
Here is a five part series by the brilliant Dr Russell Blaylock on the effects of Aspartame and MSG.
 
Introduction
http://www.anomalicresearch.com/mp3/blaylock/01.mp3
 
Aspartame, Tumors and the FDA
http://www.anomalicresearch.com/mp3/blaylock/02.mp3
 
Effects on Children and Pregnant Women
http://www.anomalicresearch.com/mp3/blaylock/03.mp3
 
Effects on Adults
http://www.anomalicresearch.com/mp3/blaylock/04.mp3
 
Reversing the Damage
http://www.anomalicresearch.com/mp3/blaylock/05.mp3