New
Articles July 5, 2007:
Report #1: EAT TO LIVE: NEW
FEARS OVER ASPARTAME
Report #2: MSG And
Aspartame
Introduction
Since the release of the 2005 Ramazzini 3-year Study on 1,800 rats,
which supports the conclusion that aspartame is linked to brain tumors
in rats, there has been much public outcry as to the safety of
aspartame in humans. I'm not qualified to answer that question,
but our Ministry of Health officials in Canada should be.
Toward that end, I have been collecting information as it has been
reported over the internet and in newspapers, which tend to indicate
that the original studies should be reviewed in light of the more
extensive recent study. I have also initiated contact with the
Minister and his officials, which has not yet been very productive.
My efforts to date are indicated below.
If you have other news items, or
anecdotal information, please contact me at: multieagle@yahoo.com with
details.
Thank you.
THE QUESTION OF ASPARTAME
Dear Rt. Hon. Minister of Health,
I have written several times and have
not yet received a satisfactory answer to my questions.
2.a What is the Ministry of
Health's official reaction to the 2005 3-year Ramazzini Study on 1,880
rats which supports the conclusion that aspartame is a causual link in
the development of brain tumors.
2.b Since the introduction of
aspartame into processed food and soft drinks has there been a rise in
the occurance of brain tumors in Canadian population. And if so,
what the yearly incidence of brain tumors?
2.c As a subsidiary question to
the above. Although a more recent wide-scale
preservative technique, a) what has been the increase in brain
tumors since the introduction of irradiated fresh foods since its
introduction, and b) has there been an increase during this period in
the level of irradiation permissible in fresh foods? Please
outline the yearly brain tumor figures by year since the introduction
of asparatme.
3. The Canadian Health
Ministry's response to me was identical to the US FDA: FDA's Consumer Online Magazine, February 2006
assures us: "[Aspartame] has come under
fire in recent years from individuals who have used the Internet in an
attempt to link the sweetener to brain tumors and other serious
disorders. But FDA stands behind its original approval of aspartame,
and subsequent evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A tiny
segment of the population is sensitive to one of the sweetener's
byproducts and should restrict intake. However, the agency continually
monitors safety information on food ingredients such as aspartame and
may take action to protect public health if it receives credible
scientific evidence indicating a safety problem"
Follows is a quote
from Dr. Betty Martini: "In 1995 FDA listed 92 symptoms from
10,000 volunteered consumer complaints including 4 types of seizures,
sexual dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems, comas and death.
So you stopped publishing the list and now deny it existed. I've sent
another 10,000. Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of case
histories has swept over you from afflicted victims and survivors
nationwide. I have copies of them. You want credible scientific
evidence? Consider this:
For 16 years FDA rejected aspartame because of brain tumors.
Then Don Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D. Searle Co, went to Washington with
Reagan and the next day his buddy Arthur Hayes was appointed FDA
Commissioner. To avoid any action against aspartame by the outgoing
Commissioner an executive freeze order was ordered by Ronald Reagan
treacherously making him powerless till Hayes got to town. Reagan was a
tragic Alzheimer's victim, a dread affliction aspartame invokes. It is
rumored he was addicted to Equal, this brain eradicating neurotoxin,
and memory loss is number 9 on your list of 92 symptoms, right under
seizures, number 8.
Now Hayes approved aspartame over the objections of his own
scientific Board of Inquiry. Searle was in money trouble until Hayes,
Rumsfeld's stooge, opened the golden door. Hayes soon was under
investigation for conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year
consulting contract from Searle's PR firm for a reported $1,000/day.
Consultants don't need to show up for work; just answer questions on
the phone, you know: How's the fishing, Artie?"
In light of the
dubious way in which aspartame was introduced into the USA, a) was
there any additional testing done by the Canadian Government? and
b) What is your Ministry's stance as to the 2004 3-year Italian study
which indicates a co-relation between aspartame and brain tumors?
Please reply via
regular mail to:
Gordon Tibbles
Thank you.
Yours truly,
Gordon Tibbles
New Material in
reference to above:
- OPEN LETTER TO FDA - VIA
CERTIFIED MAIL
- DELANEY AMENDMENT: If a
product causes cancer in animals it cannot be put in food!
- The late FDA Toxicologist,
Dr. Adrian Gross, testified to the Senate: "In view of all these
indications that the cancer-causing potential of aspartame is a matter
that had been established way beyond any reasonable doubt, one can ask:
What is the reason for the apparent refusal by the FDA to invoke for
this food additive the so-called Delaney Amendment to the Food, Drug
and Cosmetic Act? Is it not clear beyond any shadow of a doubt that
aspartame has caused brain tumors or brain cancer in animals?
- "Given that this is so (and
I cannot see any kind of tenable argument opposing the view that
aspartame causes cancer) how would the FDA justify its position that it
views a certain amount of aspartame (50mgm/kgm body weight) as
constituting an ADI (Allowable Daily Intake) or "safe" level of it? Is
that position not equivalent to setting a "tolerance" for this food
additive and thus a violation of that law? And if the FDA itself elects
to violate the law, who is left to protect the health of the public?"
- Your toxicologist admitted
you broke the law by approving aspartame. He also said the significance
of the studies is much greater if one considers that brain tumors in
rats is very rare: "the historical control rate for such tumors amongst
large populations of rats indicates that no more than 49 animals
afflicted with them have been found amongst nearly 60,000 rats, an
incidence rate of less than 1/10th of 1% FDA never fails to consider
this aspect of the "historical control" incidence. ... One cannot help
wondering just why they failed to consider this particular aspect in
reference to the cancer-induction of aspartame. Had they addressed the
historical incidence of brain tumors amongst rats as presented by Dr.
Olney, they could not have failed to conclude what I have concluded: -
tumors amongst the rats exposed to aspartame increases many-fold "
8/1/85 Senate, S 10839 - 10840
- FDA broke other laws, as
shown in the National Soft Drink Association's long protest against
approval, found in the Senate Congressional Record of 5/7/85 Pages
S5507-9: "Section 402 of the FDC Act 21 provides a food is adulterated
if it contains, in whole or in part 'a decomposed substance or if it is
otherwise unfit for food'. Searle has not demonstrated to a reasonable
certainty that aspartame and its degradation products are safe for use
in soft drinks. ... Aspartame is inherently markedly and uniquely
unstable in aqueous media. In a liquid such as a soft drink aspartame
will degrade as a function of temperature and pH."
- The hotter it gets the
quicker aspartame decomposes. NSDA next reveals Searle deliberately
used the wrong test: "High pressure liquid chromatography is a far
superior analytical method relative to thin layer chromatography and
numerous HPLC methods exist for the detection and quantification of
amino acids. Searle's choice of TLC over HPLC adversely affected the
quality and type of analytical data generated on aspartame and its
decomposition products in soft drinks.. .. an important decomposition
product of aspartame, aspartic acid cannot be detected at all using
TLC. The inability to account for as much as 39% of aspartame's
decomposition products is significant. The marked and rapid
decomposition of aspartame in soft drinks under temperatures known to
prevail is apparent from data in the present record and discussed above
in these objections."
- When responsible
scientists, physicians and legislators try to protect us from these
criminals the industry with bottomless checkbooks annihilate our rights
and welfare. Arizona DHS studies showed aspartame in beverages breaks
down into free methanol, wood alcohol, formaldehyde, diketopiperazine,
formic acid (among other toxins), and a ban of aspartame was being
considered. In 1985 Dr. Woodrow Monte, Director of Food Science and
Nutrition Lab, Arizona State University, petitioned for a hearing to
ban aspartame, because high temperatures in that state accelerate
methanol and formaldehyde formation. By an unusual maneuver the
legislature altered the text in a Toxic Waste Bill so to ban regulation
of FDA-approved food additives. This scuttled the hearing Dr. Monte had
been promised.
- How are these abominations
maneuvered? G. D. Searle lobbyists were Andrew Herwitz, Governor
Babbitt's former Chief of Staff, and other powerful hacks. Then Searle
officials contributed to the campaign of Arizona House Majority Leader
Burton Barr. The Committee to Reelect Barr gave campaign contributions
to state representatives Don Aldridge, Karen Mills, & Jan Breuer.
They all voted on the side of G. D. Searle. The legislators were bought
and paid for, and cared not for Arizona citizens. (Gordon 1987)
- Another trampled law:
Interstate Commerce regulations prohibit shipping adulterated products,
including drugs, across state lines. All aspartame products are
adulterated!
- By law an additive must be
inert. It's illegal to sell a drug as an additive. In original studies
aspartame triggered brain, mammary, uterine, ovarian, testicular,
thyroid and pancreatic tumors and is an excitoneurotoxic carcinogenic
drug. The 2005 3-year Ramazzini Study on 1,800 rats confirmed what FDA
knew from the beginning: aspartame is a multipotential carcinogen that
caused leukemia, cancer of the kidneys, lymphoma and cancer of the
cranial peripheral nerves. Only the rats fed aspartame developed
malignant brain tumors. Producers complain researchers let test animals
finish their lives rather than killing them at 24 months before most
cancers develop. Standard practice is to kill the animals before they
get sick. The Ramazzini study was peer reviewed by 7 world experts.
- So FDA's Consumer Online
Magazine, February 2006 assures us: "[Aspartame] has come under fire in
recent years from individuals who have used the Internet in an attempt
to link the sweetener to brain tumors and other serious disorders. But
FDA stands behind its original approval of aspartame, and subsequent
evaluations have shown that the product is safe. A tiny segment of the
population is sensitive to one of the sweetener's byproducts and should
restrict intake. However, the agency continually monitors safety
information on food ingredients such as aspartame and may take action
to protect public health if it receives credible scientific evidence
indicating a safety problem"
- "A tiny segment?" How about
everyone who uses it? In 1995 FDA listed 92 symptoms from 10,000
volunteered consumer complaints including 4 types of seizures, sexual
dysfunction, dozens of neurological problems, comas and death. So you
stopped publishing the list and now deny it existed. I've sent another
10,000. Renowned doctors have written you. An avalanche of case
histories has swept over you from afflicted victims and survivors
nationwide. I have copies of them. You want credible scientific
evidence? Consider this:
- For 16 years FDA rejected
aspartame because of brain tumors. Then Don Rumsfeld, CEO of G. D.
Searle Co, went to Washington with Reagan and the next day his buddy
Arthur Hayes was appointed FDA Commissioner. To avoid any action
against aspartame by the outgoing Commissioner an executive freeze
order was ordered by Ronald Reagan treacherously making him powerless
till Hayes got to town. Reagan was a tragic Alzheimer's victim, a dread
affliction aspartame invokes. It is rumored he was addicted to Equal,
this brain eradicating neurotoxin, and memory loss is number 9 on your
list of 92 symptoms, right under seizures, number 8.
- Now Hayes approved
aspartame over the objections of his own scientific Board of Inquiry.
Searle was in money trouble until Hayes, Rumsfeld's stooge, opened the
golden door. Hayes soon was under investigation for
conflict-of-interest, so he escaped with a 10-year consulting contract
from Searle's PR firm for a reported $1,000/day. Consultants don't need
to show up for work; just answer questions on the phone, you know:
How's the fishing, Artie?"
- Aspartame interacts with
all drugs and vaccines:
- http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_interacts.htm
- Aspartame-using athletes
can drop dead:
- http://www.wnho.net/aspartame_msg_scd.htm
- Aspartame Disease: An
Ignored Epidemic, 1,038 page medical text
- http://www.sunsentpress.com
- Excitotoxins, The Taste
that Kills http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
- Greek studies on aspartame,
Jan, 2006
- http://www.wnho.net/newgreekaspartame
studies.html
- Aspartame makers also
manufacture deceit http://www.wnho.net/whopper.htm
- http://www.wnho.net/recipefordeath.htm
- Doctor Ralph Walton's
investigation of funding & study-results revealed 92% of
independent studies show aspartame is a toxin. To show aspartame is
safe the producers have to buy & control the study, as they did the
Arizona legislature.
- http://www.dorway.com/peerrev.html
- Roger Williams, Member of
Parliament, has called for a British ban. England wouldn't have
approved aspartame had FDA's intended indictment been known. Searle
sneaked it thru by dealing with Paul Turner of Food Standards, who
approved it without publicity. A Guardian article detailed the
collusion.
- FDA asked the Justice
Department to prosecute G. D. Searle Co. for fraud, but the producers
hired the prosecutors and the case expired with the statute of
limitations. Neat trick! As an encore a parade of FDA officials
including 3 Commissioners have been welcomed into the aspartame
business. Telling FDA of aspartame toxicity is complaining to the Mafia
about murder.
- In the CDC documentary:
SWEET MISERY: A POISONED WORLD [amazon.com & Barnes & Noble]
see Atty. James Turner, former Nader Raider, explain how Don Rumsfeld
called in his markers to get it approved. FDA had revoked approval
because of the brain tumor issue, and because it was not proven safe,
leaving this question: For 16 years until Hayes overruled your Board of
Inquiry the FDA denied approval and tried to indict Searle for fraud:
So why lie about it now? Is there another answer than political
corruption? Meanwhile you attempt a rule change to prevent states from
writing food safety laws. Do you intend to now go against the Bill of
Rights, 9 and 10th amendment which forbids removing the rights of the
people and the states?
- In the Falklands Robin
Goodwin has called for a ban. In New Mexico Stephen Fox has petitioned
the Environmental Improvement Board and the Board of Pharmacy to ban
aspartame in New Mexico based on the fact that aspartame is adulterated
and against the law. Governor Bill Richardson III has been asked by 10
New Mexico State Senators to declare a state of public health
emergency, in accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5. The emergency derives from
consumers in New Mexico consuming methanol and formaldehyde, derivative
aspartame metabolites.
- You say you "may" take
action to protect public health if you receive credible scientific
evidence indicating a safety problem? A mountain of absolute evidence
is in your possession! The impeccable Italian study proves aspartame is
"a multipotential carcinogen". The bottom line of the new Greek study
is Alzheimers. The world's population are guinea pigs, daily proving
aspartame destroys the brain, central nervous system, immune system and
retina, causes cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, precipitates
diabetes, interacts with all drugs and vaccines, triggers obesity and
is an endocrine disrupting drug, an abortifacient, adjuvant and
teratogen that brings birth defects and retardation. University of
Texas epidemiological study on 8 years data linked diet drinks with
obesity just a few months ago.
- Obviously your allegiance
is to Big Pharma & their lobbyists, who are the Washington
infestation destroying America with chemical weapons of mass
destruction, while you pretend to be saviors and seek to outlaw
vitamins and herbs.
- http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/spingola/060207
- You once attempted to
indict G. D. Searle at a time when you had some conscience under Title
18, Section 1001.
- This US Criminal Code
declares: "Whoever, in an matter within the jurisdiction of the
executive, legislative or judicial matter branch of the Government of
the United States, knowingly and willfully
- * (1) falsifies, conceals,
or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
- * (2) makes any materially
false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation;
- * (3) or make or uses any
false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially
false,
- fictitious, or fraudulent
statement or entry, shall be fined under the title or imprisoned.
- Today FDA, you are now
guilty of the same crime as you deceive the public by telling them
aspartame is safe when you have full knowledge it is not only not safe,
but that you wanted the manufacturer indicted for fraud. Your own
toxicologists, Dr. Adrian Gross and Dr. Jacqueline Verrett observed
Searle researchers' manipulation attempting to make a poison show
safety. They just couldn't do it as Jerome Bressler explained in the
FDA audit. They were caught.
- Four years ago I filed a
Citizens Petition for ban:
- http://www.wnho.net/citizens_aspartame_petition.htm
The law requires an answer in 180 days, which law you broke, and
brazenly wrote me that you have matters of higher priority. Saving
consumer lives is low priority? Or was it impossible to answer my
petition that proved from government records that you lie to America?
- James Bowen, M.D. with Lou
Gehrigs disease from aspartame, wrote FDA: "The only responsible action
would be to immediately take aspartame off the market, fully disclose
its toxicities, offer full compensation to the injured, public and
criminally prosecute anyone who participated in the fraudulent
placement of aspartame on the marketplace. That includes those who work
so diligently to keep it on the market as well."
- In secret trade information
Searle said: "With the spoon-for-spoon, we have no way of estimating
maximum likely abuse and hence need to utilize data based on almost
complete conversion to DKP. If we include this use in the original FAP,
we stand a good chance of ending up with nothing in the short run and
nothing in the long run where as the other approach would give us
something in the short run and, quite likely as much as we would ever
get in the long run." DKP is the brain tumor agent. They knew aspartame
would cause these tumors worldwide. Premeditated mass murder!
- www.dorway.com
- Heroic New Mexico Senator
Gerald Ortiz y Pino who just sponsored the bill to ban aspartame said
- "Nothing surprises me
anymore when it comes to the corrosive influence of money on our public
policy... the final reckoning can only be postponed, not avoided"
- http://www.rense.com/general69/nmm2.htm
- I demand that you invoke
the Delaney Amendment! James Turner, who with Dr. John Olney worked to
prevent aspartame approval, declares the Delaney Amendment remains as
written, although many have attempted to try and repeal it and Michael
Taylor wrote a clause attempting to minimize it. Yet they did not
succeed he says and it is as valid today as the day it became the law.
The Ramazzini study confirms aspartame is a virulent carcinogen. This
requires FDA to invoke the Delaney Amendment which is emphatic if
a product causes cancer in animals it CANNOT BE PUT IN FOOD.
- This should have been done
a quarter of a century ago as your scientists advocated. Refusal will
confirm once more that FDA is run by political lapdogs dedicated to
their personal aggrandizement, treacherously condemning multitudes to
disability and death. Mission Possible is a global volunteer force
warning consumers about aspartame because FDA refuses to fulfill its
commission to enforce laws that protect us.
- We're taking aspartame
brain tumor cases in NY and NJ for litigation, and this is just the
beginning. This is written as an open letter so all reading it will
send it to their congressman, explaining how FDA has sanctioned mass
poisoning by bureaucratic fiat.
- Be warned: A higher judge
untouched by bribes has pronounced the inevitable consequence of such
duplicity: "Woe to you who are despoiling and who are dealing
treacherously As soon as you have finished as a despoiler, you will be
despoiled. As soon as you have done with dealing treacherously, they
will deal treacherously with you." Isaiah 33:1 NWT
- Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum,
Founder
- Mission Possible
International
- 9270 River Club Parkway
- Duluth, Georgia 30097
- 770 242-2599
- http://www.wnho.net/
- http://www.dorway.com/
- www.holisticmed.com/aspartame
-
- Aspartame Toxicity Center
|
Dear Sir/Madam, the question of safety
appears to rest on evidence originally conducted by testing agencies on
behalf of the aspartame industry. That testing has come under
serious scrutiny in the USA and other countries. It would appear
that some tests were "fudged" to put it mildly, and that the original
author of one test that weighed heavily in the US FDA approval process
will not give interviews, and in fact, cannot be currently located.
The New Mexico action preceded the
new seven (7) year round of testing conducted in Italy, the
most comprehensive to date, which demonstrates definite
carcinogenic actions.
I request again, reference to specific
tests undertaken by Health Canada, or failing such tests on the part of
Canada, a list of the research test, giving the author's credentials
and who funded the tests.
Looking forward to your response, I
remain
Yours truly,
Gordon Tibbles
BACKGROUND TO THE ABOVE
-----
Original Message -----
To:
Sent:
Friday, February 17, 2006 11:42 AM
Subject:
In response to your correspondence of February 13 and 14, 2006,
addressed to the Minister of Health
Dear Mr. Tibbles:
Thank you for your correspondence of
February 13, and February 14, 2006, addressed to the Honourable Tony
Clement, Minister of Health, concerning the safety of aspartame.
Before permitting the use of aspartame in
foods in Canada, Health Canada officials evaluated an extensive array
of toxicological tests. Since its approval, a number of clinical
studies have been conducted on aspartame. To date, there is no
evidence to suggest that the consumption of foods containing aspartame,
according to the provisions of the Food and Drug Regulations, and as
part of a well-balanced diet, poses a health hazard to consumers.
In addition, international organizations, such as the Scientific
Committee for Food of the European Community, and the Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health
Organization Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, have reached
similar conclusions.
Nevertheless, some individuals may exhibit
an allergic-type reaction or hypersensitivity when exposed to
aspartame. For those who suffer from this sensitivity, avoiding
this substance is recommended. Therefore, in accordance with the
Food and Drug Regulations, its presence must be declared on food labels.
Departmental officials are aware of claims
made against aspartame, and continue to monitor and evaluate new
research and, as yet, have not found clinical studies that associate
its use with the onset of diseases or adverse effects. Should
studies raise concerns about the use of aspartame, Health Canada would
take appropriate measures to protect the health of Canadians.
Further information relating to the safety
of aspartame can be found on Health Canada's Web site at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.c/fn-an/securit/facts-faits/aspartame/aspartame01_e.html.
Again, thank you for writing.
Yours sincerely,
Executive Correspondence Division
Dear Rt. Hon. Clement,
I have previously been in contact with
the Ministry regarding the use of aspartame in food. I did not
receive a reply to my querry, other than that the memo would be sent to
the appropriate department.
There is an increasing conern that
aspartame contributes to serious health issues. The following
article in reference to the United States, New Mexico government
actions to have aspartame banned as a food additive.
Can you assure the Canadian citizens
that this drug is entirely safe to ingest? If so, would you
please have your staff forward appropriate references to tests which
prove that no health issues exist?
If necessary, I will follow this email
querry with a regular mail.
Please advise.
Thank you,
Gordon Tibbles
- New Mexico Governor William
Blaine Richardson III has been requested by 10 New Mexico State
Senators in a letter to declare a state of public health emergency, in
accordance with NMSA 12-10A-5.
- To wit:
- "The nature of the
emergency derives from 70% of the adults and 40% of the children in New
Mexico having consumed methanol and formaldehyde, the resultant
metabolites from their ingestion of aspartame. The conditions that
cause the emergency are the fact that the G.D. Searle Corporation
ramrodded the approval of this illegal drug through the United States
Food and Drug Administration in 1981 asa 'food additive.' It is now
found in over 6,000 food products and over 600 children's
medications,vitamins, and aspirin."
- "The expected duration of
the emergency is more than thirty days necessary to prevent further
instances of methanol/formaldehyde poisoning, and will end when all
products containing aspartame, a poisonous and deleterious food
additive are removed from sale in New Mexico in accordance with
statutes in the New Mexico Food act."
- Richardson has been
requested by the 10 Senators to recognize aspartame disease as a public
health emergency on February 13, 2006.
- The Senators include
Judiciary Chairman, Cisco Mc Sorley; Indian Affairs Chairman, John
Pinto, Navajo; Rules Chair, Linda Lopez; Conservation Chairman, Carlos
Cisneros, Finance Committee Vice Chair, John Arthur Smith; Corporations
Committee, Bernadette Sanchez; Indian Affairs Vice Chairman, Lidio
Rainaldi; Rules Vice Chair, John Grubesic; Gerald Ortiz y Pino,and
Leonard Tsosie, Navajo.
- Most of the New Mexico
Legislators have been given copies of Cori Brackett's DVD, Sweet
Misery, to educate them during the Interim before next Session for the
New Mexico Legislature.
- _____
- To be apprised of Governor
Richardson's response, call Deputy Secretary of Communications Phal
Shipley (505)827-3000.
- Also see the New York Times
Aspartame/Methanol/Formaldehyde in 6000 manufactured food products:
article Feb.12,2006 by Melanie Warner.
- For more information on the
neurodegenerative effects of Aspartame from Neurosurgeon Russell
Blaylock, contact him in Ridgeland, Mississippi, through Dr. Betty
Martini, D.Hum. (770) 242-2599.
- For medical effects,
particularly the effects of aspartame/methanol/formaldehyde on
diabetics, please contact Internist H.J. Roberts, author of Aspartame
Disease: An FDA Approved Epidemic, through Dr. Martini (770) 242-2599
hjrobertsmd@aol.com
- For information on
discussions between state's Attorneys General regarding Aspartame suits
similar to the Tobacco Suits of the 1990's, please contact Eliot
Spitzer of New York; Mike Hatch of Minnesota; former Attorney General
of Mississippi, Mike Moore; former Attorney General of Washington, now
Governor Christine O. Gregoire; Attorney General Drew Edmondson of
Oklahoma; Attorney General of California, William Lockyer; Illinois
Attorney General Lisa Madigan; Deputy Attorney General of California,
Ed Weil; Deputy Attorney General of New Mexico, Stuart Bluestone, and
the next Attorney General of New Mexico, Dr. Gary King, Ph.D. Chemistry.
- New Mexico Secretary of
Health is Michelle Lujan Grisham and Secretary of Public Safety is John
Denko.
- For more articles on
Aspartame, please see website for World Natural Health Organization:
www.wnho.net
- Stephen Fox, Founder, New
Mexico Nutrition Council International Board of Honorary Advisors of
World Natural Health Organization stephen@santafefineart.com (505)
983-2002
|
EAT TO LIVE: NEW FEARS OVER ASPARTAME
By JULIA WATSON
UPI Food Writer
LE BUGUE, France, July 2 (UPI) --
Two years ago,
Italian researchers at the prestigious Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology
and Environmental Sciences published a study that showed feeding rats
aspartame at levels per body weight close to those of humans led to an
increase in brain tumors, lymphomas and leukemia in the females.
Aspartame, familiar to consumers as brand names NutraSweet and
Equal, is an artificial sweetener found globally in approximately 6,000
products.
It's contained in candy, desserts and yogurts. It's in diet sodas
and hot chocolate and those sugar-free packets for coffee and tea in
restaurants. It's also in some pharmaceutical products, like cough
lozenges and vitamins. Some chewing gum is aspartame-sweetened.
At this level of saturation, it represents 62 percent of the
artificial sweetener market.
As reported by Eat To Live last May, the FDA rejected the
foundation's conclusions, saying they weren't consistent with other
studies that the FDA had evaluated that confirmed aspartame was safe as
a sweet alternative to sugar.
So the Ramazzini Foundation went back to the drawing board.
This time, it put 4,000 rats on doses of aspartame equivalent in
respective body weight to the amount consumed by some people.
With this second investigation, they also began exposing rats to
aspartame before they were born. And they allowed them to live until
they died a natural death, instead of killing them at two years as in
other studies elsewhere.
Their conclusions have just been published in Environmental Health
Perspectives, the journal of the U.S. National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences.
Parents should take particular note.
Again, they found significant increases in lymphomas and leukemia.
When fetuses were exposed to the sweetener, the potential carcinogenic
effects increased.
A study last year from the National Cancer Institute involving
340,045 men and 226,945 women found no significant link between
aspartame and cancer.
But the men and women studied were all between the ages of 50 and 69
and had only begun consuming the sweetener in adulthood.
Children are considerable consumers of aspartame through Diet Coke,
Diet Pepsi, Kool-Aid, Jell-O gelatin dessert and pudding mixes and
certain Popsicles.
According to the Center for Science in the Public Interest, the
acceptable daily intake of aspartame is equivalent to a child weighing
50 pounds drinking two cans of diet soda daily, or a 150 pound adult
drinking just over seven.
It encourages people not to panic. Just to stop buying products
containing aspartame.
However, the Ramazzini Foundation researchers write in their study:
"On the basis of the present findings, we believe that a review of the
current regulations governing the use of aspartame cannot be delayed.
"This review is particularly urgent with regard to
aspartame-containing beverages, heavily consumed by children."
The FDA says it has not yet reviewed the report. But it appears it
still finds no reason to revise its opinion or advice to consumers.
Since the study's publication, the Center for Science in the Public
Interest, on its Web site Chemical Cuisine directory, has now demoted
aspartame from the "use caution" category to "everyone should avoid".
It also gives thumbs down to acesulfame.
If you want a sweet alternative to sugar, it recommends sucralose,
commonly known by the brand name Splenda.
To satisfy a sweet tooth craving, try chewing on dried apricots or a
handful of dried prunes or raisins. Stewing then pureeing dried
apricots provides a very sweet sauce to pour round or over ice cream or
slices of cake that already contain enough of the sugar you crave that
you don't need to increase the amount with a butterscotch or chocolate
sauce.
-
MSG And
Aspartame
By Dr. Russell Blaylock
-
A Five Part Audio Series
http://www.russellblaylockmd.com
7-4-7
-
Dr. Rusell Blayloack, M.D.
-
-